At this point we are ready to dissect Moravec's argument in detail. You have waited long enough so let me share exactly how we will be decimating his argument. We will do so in two ways. First we will criticize his argument on it's own terms: we will show that by his own definitions his claims are contradictory. In other words, his argument is rotten to the core. This will allow us to show *that* his argument is incorrect. Second, we will show that why his argument *looked* reasonable and where he went wrong. This will show *how* and *why* his argument is wrong. In other words it will *explain* why it is wrong, and in the process show why it was *so slippery to argue against*.