# Logical Gap A **logical gap** is a missing step in reasoning—when an argument jumps from one point to another without clearly showing how the conclusion follows from the premises. It often happens when: - An **assumption** is made without support. - A **premise** is left out but is necessary for the argument to hold. - The **connection** between ideas isn’t adequately explained. ### **Example:** * Premise: People who study hard get good grades. * Conclusion: Alex will get good grades. This has a **logical gap**—it assumes Alex studies hard, but never states it. In philosophy, critical thinking, or debates, pointing out logical gaps is a way to say, “You’re not showing your work.” Bridging that gap means either adding a missing premise or better explaining how the conclusion follows. --- Date: 20250403 Links to: [Logic](Logic.md) [Bad Reasoning](Bad%20Reasoning.md) Tags: References: * []()